One of the main barriers to schemes starting their GMP equalisation projects has been a lack of certainty as to how the pensions tax rules will apply. On 20 February 2020 HMRC issued initial guidance on these pensions tax issues.
At the end of October 2018, the High Court ruled that schemes must equalise benefits to address the unequal effects of Guaranteed Minimum Pensions (GMPs).
Since then, an industry-wide working group has been established and has published initial guidance. The DWP has also published guidance on how the GMP conversion legislation can be used to equalise for the effect of GMPs.
In our experience however, few schemes have actually started to equalise. One reason for this is that it has not been clear how any changes needed to members’ benefits will fit with the pensions tax rules. Questions include the following:
The guidance issued focusses on the Annual Allowance and the Lifetime Allowance, including Lifetime Allowance protections.
In summary, it suggests that where benefits are increased as the result of GMP equalisation, the increase will not normally count for Annual or Lifetime Allowance purposes, or result in loss of existing Lifetime Allowance protections. It will, however, be counted for the purposes of testing benefits against the Lifetime Allowance when, for example, a member retires. Payment of arrears is also dealt with.
The guidance only applies to schemes which use one of the year-by-year (dual record keeping) methods for GMP equalisation, and make ‘pure equalisation’ adjustments.
It will not apply to schemes that want to equalise using the GMP conversion method and or to make other adjustments to benefits. For schemes considering GMP conversion, HMRC also warns that conversion could have pensions tax consequences for some members, for example, loss of “deferred members carve-out” for annual allowance purposes “or fixed protection, or both”.
HMRC says that it is still considering other pensions tax issues, including “the treatment of lump sum and death benefit payments” and that it aims “to give more guidance on these as soon as possible as well as continue to explore the tax implications for schemes choosing to use the conversion methodology”.
The guidance is a helpful starting point for schemes interested in using one of the year-by-year (dual record keeping) GMP equalisation methods. However, these schemes might need to wait for further guidance from HMRC before they can proceed.
Schemes that want to use the GMP conversion method to equalise will need to wait for further guidance and see what clarification HMRC is able to provide.
We expect that schemes will continue with their GMP reconciliation projects and take the steps to prepare for a GMP equalisation project that are recommended in the industry-wide working group’s ‘call to action’.
We also need to look out for:
HMRC warned last year that the first guidance note would not address all of the pension tax questions that arise in connection with GMP equalisation. We welcome the clarification that the note brings and suggest that we and other trustees, alongside employers discuss the guidance with the advisers who are helping them with their GMP equalisation project.